top of page

The FCA: Protecting Wealth, Just Not Yours


Picture this: You’re 80 years old, battling cancer, recently divorced, and to top it all off, you’re blind. Just when you think life couldn’t possibly deal you a worse hand, you find out that your entire life savings have vanished. Gone. Poof. Up in smoke. Thanks to the fine work of your trusted wealth manager and, of course, the diligent oversight of our favourite regulatory body, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).


Gerry Woolfeden, who now relies on his guide dog Philip to navigate the world, was one of over a thousand pensioners who woke up one day to find their retirement pots had been spectacularly mismanaged into oblivion. WealthTek, the firm responsible, was regulated by the FCA—yes, that same FCA that’s supposed to keep an eye out for precisely this kind of debacle. But don’t worry; they were on the case... eventually.


It only took them two years after a whistleblower, one of WealthTek’s own, raised the alarm. Two years. Plenty of time for the alleged fraud to flourish and for savers like Mr Woolfeden to watch their retirement dreams dissolve into thin air. By the time the FCA acted, the damage was done, and thousands of pensioners were left clinging to the hope of compensation. But even that’s not the happy ending you’d expect.


You see, in the wonderful world of financial regulation, there’s always someone ready to pick up the pieces—and, naturally, charge you for the privilege. Enter the administrators, BDO, who, in their wisdom, have decided to carve out a juicy chunk of the compensation pot to cover their fees. Because, really, what’s a few more thousand pounds when you’re already staring down the barrel of a £160,000 loss?


For those who’ve lost everything, the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) swoops in to save the day with up to £85,000 in compensation—minus up to £23,000 for administrative costs, of course. So, if you’re unlucky enough to have lost more than £62,000, you can expect to be short-changed yet again. But hey, at least you’ll get back something, right? After all, it’s not like you needed all that money for silly things like healthcare, housing, or, you know, living.


And let’s not forget the legal firms, the real winners here, who are happily deducting their fees from these compensation payouts. Because in the end, why should they miss out on the spoils of financial carnage?


Victims like Mr Woolfeden are rightfully furious, not just at the crooks who ran off with their savings, but at the very regulators who were supposed to be watching their backs. “The FCA has been absolutely incompetent,” he says. Incompetent doesn’t quite cover it, though, does it? Perhaps “asleep at the wheel” would be more accurate, or maybe “complicit in a slow-motion disaster.”


The FCA, meanwhile, has offered the usual platitudes about ongoing investigations and the need to protect whistleblowers. All very noble, I’m sure, but perhaps they could start with protecting the people who’ve lost everything due to their inaction.


So here we are, with over a thousand pensioners out of pocket, some quite literally borrowing from their children just to get by, while the FCA continues to “monitor the situation.” And as the legal firms and administrators pick over the bones of what’s left, one can’t help but wonder: Who’s really being protected here? Because it sure as hell isn’t the people who trusted the system to safeguard their life savings.


In the end, the message is clear: When it comes to your financial future, you’re on your own. And if things go belly up, don’t expect the FCA to swoop in and save the day. They’re far too busy tidying up the mess—after they’ve had a nice, long nap, of course.

6 views0 comments

Comments


bottom of page