
Ah, the Investment Association (IA) is at it again, trumpeting the need for pension reform. And naturally, their answer to ensuring the "financial futures" of the British public is to funnel even more cash into the £2.2 trillion already being managed by UK investment managers. Because, of course, £2.2 trillion just isn’t quite enough to keep shareholders’ pockets lined and bankers’ bonuses bubbling. Forget the cost of living crisis. Let’s ignore the fact that families across the UK are choosing between heating and eating. Clearly, the real problem here is that pension schemes aren't quite fat enough yet.
So, what’s the IA’s brilliant solution? They want bigger pensions. No, not better pensions in terms of human capital development that actually prepares people for longevity of earning power, but bigger in terms of cold, hard cash. Contributions must go up, because apparently, the only way to secure a decent retirement is to shovel more of your dwindling pay packet into the pensions pot.
But wait, there’s more. Not only should we be contributing more, but we should be supporting “sophisticated scale” too. What does that mean, you ask? Well, it’s simple. It’s not just about the size of the pension scheme, they say, it’s about strong governance, accountability, and expertise. Naturally, they suggest that the experts best suited to handle this are the investment managers themselves. And while they're at it, they want a cultural shift that focuses on “long-term value” rather than cost. Translation? We should all stop worrying about how much we’re paying in fees and start thinking about how lucky we are that our pensions are being invested in long-term strategies that might pay off decades down the line.
But what about those pesky operational issues that get in the way of those long-term gains? Well, the IA has that covered too. They want more competitive and innovative UK capital markets. Naturally, that involves a bit of government action – like scrapping stamp duty on UK-listed equities – because who wouldn’t want to make things a little easier for investment managers to play with your retirement savings?
The icing on the cake? They want to push for “a better retirement income experience.” Because, as we all know, retirement is just like Disneyland – and we need the right “experience” to really make it work. Apparently, new products and decisions for savers will make sure your twilight years are filled with enough income to keep the machine going. No mention of human capital, no talk of developing skills to ensure you can still earn into later life. Just products, products, products.
In reality, of course, what’s really happening here is that the IA is looking for a bigger slice of the pie. They want more capital to play with, more fees to collect, and a bigger playground for the investment managers to roll the dice with your money. Let’s not kid ourselves – the focus isn’t on securing your future; it’s on securing their profits. We can keep pouring money into the pension black hole, or we could actually invest in human capital – you know, real people with real skills that could actually boost earnings well into later life. But where’s the fun in that?
So, the next time the IA calls for pension reform, remember: it’s not about your retirement, it’s about theirs. After all, those bonuses won’t pay themselves.
Comments